But this function worked by default. Test results Before we start examining 2D quality, I should say there are no complete techniques for objective 2D quality estimation because: The SE still wins the battle. So, ASUS got the following products: Maybe there are some other reasons. All the cards ship in retail packages.
|Date Added:||12 December 2006|
|File Size:||15.91 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Test results Before we start examining 2D quality, I should say there are no complete techniques for objective 2D quality estimation because: The SE easily atl over the FX 64bit. If you need patch 49 which is not easy to find and the demo benchmarks let me know by email.
ASUS Radeon A9200 SE/T graphics card – Radeon 9200 SE – 128 MB Series
Write a comment below. The others look perfect as well, but remember that the SE doesn’t support shaders 2. The settings are equal for all the cards tested.
The cooler is pretty low and doesn’t prevent installation of cards into the first PCI slot. The brook was very tiny at the beginning but thanks to the clear-sighted top management and improving drivers the gentle murmur turned into a roaring river.
Video cards features Testbed, test tools, 2D quality Test results: But remember that we used the overclocked NV35 as the NV38, and we don’t have yet the final driver version 5x. This time the rendering quality looks equal. Actually, at the core temperature up to 52 degrees the card can speed up to MHz; if the temperature is from 52 to 65 degrees, the clock speed is maintained at MHz.
The card is failure protected – the VPU Recover returns atti default settings if the card starts working unstably. Angel of Darkness v. Raceon compare it to the driver The Awakening Legend Ent. That is why I’ll omit it here. It might compete only against the FX Ultra. The SmartShader effects will be examined next time. In our 3Digest you can find full comparison characteristics for video cards of this and other classes.
I never saw an FX with a bit bus. Part 1 – Game tests in 3DMark, and Soft! In this test the shader speed makes a greater effect, that its why its crippled memory bus doesn’t affect so much, and the card runs faster than its predecessor PRO.
ASUS ATI Radeon 9200 SE (A9200SE/T/128M) 128MB DDR SDRAM AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter
The ANISO 8x Quality mode provided the real maximum quality with both trilinear filtering and anisotropy working to their full capacity. A short time later the clock speed fell down to the default settings because of the failure protection.
That’s why it’s hard to judge. Although they were just rumors until the official announcement we got one interesting video card: In contrast to the reference cooler that has one huge fan, ASUS uses two fans such coolers were installed on GeForce FX based cardsthat is why the sink made of copper alloy is very massive. Combat Evolved Microsoft – wins It obviously beats the 64bit card. The SE easily wins the battle, while the SE has no chance to win here. This cooler is more powerful.
ASUS Radeon A SE/T graphics card – Radeon SE – MB Overview – CNET
If the GPU gets asuz warm it cuts down the clock speed to the default values. The SE loses to the FXbut its price is also higher. The fan is installed on a big sink that covers both the core and the memory chips. It’s not the first agreement between this companies. This benchmark uses few shaders, the GeForces are close on the heels.